For
once I will stray from my typical rants regarding Rob Ford (not that
media blackouts and the illegal purchase of municipal land are boring)
and the TTC (not that rampant absenteeism and financial irregularities
fail to interest) and talk about TV. Mostly because I am both tired of
looking at how my city is handling itself, and because sometimes an
employer commits such a public faux-pas that it's impossible to think of
anything else.
NBC has been known for making fairly
poor decisions, and is mostly considered to be justly last in American
networks. Since many of my favorite shows air on the peakcock, I was
inclined to disagree, but no more. Community is a show, for those who
don't know, that has been airing since 2009 when it was created by
writer and producer Dan Harmon. He has been in the news quite a bit in
the past few months for missteps such as publicizing private voicemails
from actors on the show, rumors circulating that he was failing to
finish scripts on time, and threw tantrums on set to get his way. It
seems the network has decided that they'd had enough, and the value his
creative mind generated presumably was outweighed by his behaviour.
Whether this is the case or not really isn't relevant here, nor do I
feel I know enough about the situation to comment one way or the other
(though as a fan, I fear change).
The issue at hand is
how he was terminated. Technically, as a writer/producer he was on
contract, and that contract expired. They were under no obligation to
renew (though the assumption is that if you continue a project, you will
keep the driving force behind it) and, it seems, already had a couple
of people lined up for the position. They released a press release
indicating the new showrunners, suggesting that Mr. Harmon would take on
a consulting role, and that, prior to the internet, would have been the
end of it. Mr. Harmon posted on his tumbler later that night that he
had received no communications from NBC, nor did he agree to any
substitute position with the show. Since there had been no indication
that he would be removed from his position (even with all the errors in
judgement), to terminate a working relationship through the media seems
unethical to me. Not only does it disrespect the employee, but it
affects the morale of everyone at the company, who now know that their
jobs are on the line even if they are not aware of it - perhaps tomorrow
they will open the newspaper and their name will be there as an
ex-employee. Such poor judgement at the top level can put an entire
department at risk as stakeholders lose faith in the project's ability.
Where was the HR department to put a stop to this nonsensical level
of theatrics before the axe was dropped?
The reaction has been fairly distinct. Fans of the
show have panned the decision, TV critics have noted that the decision
to continue a creative experiment without the creator was an exercise
doomed to fail, and employees have reached out in sympathy. It seems
quite a few of the writers will also be moving on, perhaps to an
employer that will offer them a little more respect.
While
what they did was not illegal, it was downright distasteful, and shines
a bad light on everyone involved. Discretion in such situations is
paramount, and it is a lesson that NBC and Sony are now being forced to
learn through the public lynching they face.
On a side note, if you have not seen this show yet, I suggest you take the time. You will not regret it.
#sixseasonsandamovie